Last week, the United States Women’s National Team began their run through the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup with a 3-0 win over Vietnam, but they drew a lot of criticism for what happened before the game, when the majority of the team chose not to sing the national anthem during the pregame ceremonies. Despite the backlash, those same players were once again silent during the second game of the tournament.
When the Star Spangled Banner played ahead of Wednesday night’s match against the Netherlands, most players in the starting lineup once again chose to remain silent and not put their hands over their hearts during the song.
“Six players, including Andi Sullivan, Sophia Smith, Naomi Girma, Emily Fox, Trinity Rodman and Crystal Dunn, had chosen not to sing the anthem in the opening game against Vietnam and refused to do so again against the Dutch,” Yahoo Sports wrote.
Naturally, this decision led to all sort of conversation on social media as several people gave their thoughts on the matter.
How did this become a thing? They were standing, mostly with hands over their hearts, a few singing along. I watch tons of sports and since when has not singing along been some evidence of protest? Stop being manipulated by Megyn and others pining to find some outrage grift. https://t.co/gdZdOO8Czy
— Astrid Spain
(@astridspain1) July 27, 2023
Several players did, however, choose to sing the national anthem including Alex Morgan, Julie Ertz and Lindsey Horan. But it’s become clear that it’s up to the individual player whether or not they decide to sing the national anthem.
About Kevin Harrish
Recent Posts
Articles
Daniel Jones and the Colts Still Have a Super Bowl Window
Articles
Patriots Fatigue Blinds You: Drake Maye Is a Super Bowl Threat
Eagles getting tired of Jalen Hurts
The Philadelphia Eagles are growing impatient
Bryce Young shatters Cam Newton record
Bryce Young is ascending
The pressure is on New York Giants ownership to pick the right coach
President, CEO, and co-owner John Mara can't afford another bad hire.
Edgar Wright’s ‘The Running Man’ is both better and worse than the original
The 2025 reboot is a vast improvement in terms of filmmaking, but the 1987 version is more fun.